Jeff Watkins Performance and Photography
  • Home
  • Actor
    • Body of Work
    • News and Updates
    • Gallery
    • Video Samples
    • Audio Samples
    • The Silent City Movie
  • Jeff Watkins Photography
    • Head Shots
    • Film, Theatre, TV
    • Weddings and Events
    • Industrial and Landscapes
    • Video Editing
  • Contact
  • Print Shop

August 09th, 2013

9/8/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
Well, tomorrow it is back to filming for The Silent City. I have four more scenes for Jack to do, and this Saturday is a big one. A total of seven hours on set as it is scheduled, but who knows, it may be more. At least this time around, it will be during the day as opposed to the late evening at near zero temperatures. Which reminds me, I must review my lines tonight, just to have them fresh in my mind.

Coming from a background dominated by theatre, I have been told many times about how different theatre and film are. Well, I'm here to say that that is a load of bollocks. There is no difference when it comes to acting. Sure, theatre is all-in-one-take and film has edits, camera angles, and is more start and stop, but the performances required of the actor are no different.

The "volume" of a performance in theatre can vary depending on the size of the theatre and the closeness of the audience. If you are playing to a small 50-seat private theatre where the audience are sitting right at the edge of the stage, you would play a more intimate and toned down performance than if you were to play to a 500 seat, multilevel Regal Theatre. Cinema is no different in that aspect except that the size of your performance can change in the progression of a single scene, from an extreme close-up to a long shot, then back again. The technical aspects may be different, but how you perform or act remains the same.

Once I was able to, as Yoda put it, unlearn what I had learnt, i.e. that film requires a completely different style of acting, I found the process far more enjoyable. I am still creating a character with ideals, purpose, plans, associations and flaws, just as I would in theatre. That character is still reacting to various events occurring around them, just as in theatre. From this base point of view, there is no difference between the two.

That being said, I found one thing different in film that I did not expect; it offers the opportunity for a more varied performance. The audience can be, at any moment, close or far and coming from any angle. You are no longer playing to a fixed imaginary "fourth-wall" as this is now a moving point in space. As an actor, you still need to be aware of this point in space just as much as you need to be aware of the fourth-wall in theatre. You are still performing for an audience after all, but as it is no longer fixed, you now have an extra dimension to perform with.

Tomorrow I return to the film set. It will be a large set with a large number of extras and ... things going on. It will be busy and most of all, exciting. Yet I will still be the same; Jack O'Rielly, with all his traits and faults.

0 Comments

Twelfth Night Review

4/8/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
It was been some weeks since the closing night of Twelfth Night and I recently was sent two "reviews" for the show. I use quotations because these are rather special "reviews," in that they have been written by adjudicators for a local Community and Independent Theatre Awards ceremony called the Robert Finley Awards, which is basically the Perth Non-professional version of the Tony Awards.

These two reviews were actually rather pleasing to read. Being somewhat brief (a necessity due to the need not to give away anything too early) they were, on the whole, very appreciative of the two separate performances seen by the judges. The only critical aspects were a couple of directional choices which I therefore am happy to take completely on me. My cast were brilliant and it was wonderful to see no negative concerns regarding any of them.

I set out with a specific goal in mind, to demonstrate that Twelfth Night was a wonderful comedy, not a melodrama as it is so often portrayed. In that, I believe we were entirely successful. The number of genuine and unsought for remarks that patrons did not realise that the play was that funny and fast paced was incredible. This too was reflected in the reports from the two adjudicators.

Orsino, the character upon which much of my direction choice was made, is frequently portrayed as a melancholic romantic type whom is more love-sick than head-over-heels in lust, yet this character opens the play. His first scene, and most famous speech, "If music be the food of love" are the first thing that audiences see. I see only two ways to play this; either overly dramatic to the point of drama queen, or as a passionate plea to the mysterious gods of love. I went more for the latter having come from a pub where he has been drowning his frustrations with one too many jugs of ale.

By injecting a high level of energy and pace to this opening scene, it set a bar for the rest of the cast to follow, and follow they did. The pace was such that we were able to do the entire script without cutting a single word, officially. Mind you, through a little improvisation and slips, the occasional word may have been lost.

That said, Twelfth Night is not without more serious or poignant moments, such as the heated argument between Orsino and Viola, the incarceration and release of Malvolio and the exchange of heated words between Orsino, Viola and Olivia at the plays end. There is even one instance when the fool of the play, Feste, comes down from his silly antics and wordplay, to berate Malvolio for his thoughtlessness and nasty comments.

Interestingly enough, the most memorable character of the play is, at first meeting, the most annoying. Malvolio, Olivia's steward, starts off being obnoxious, uptight and very condescending. We are not meant to like him. So when he is then given his "just deserts" and locked in a dungeon as a madman, we are then brought to feel sorry for him at the plays end when all that has been done is revealed to him. People have often made the comment to me that they would like to see him have a happy ending. I feel that this would ruin his importance in the play. We are meant to hate him then long for him. Through his journey, he wins our heart and holds it. If he were then to have a happy ending, he would no longer need our love and care.

So why was he written this way? We can only guess, and my guess was to look in to ourselves and see the hypocrisy of human nature. How easy is for a person to put on a façade of arrogance in order to protect themselves from the barbs of the world. How easy it is for that world to fall away when dreams and hopes seems but a small step away. How deep the wound is when, having opened ourselves to the possibility of hope, to then have that hope ripped away from us.

Twelfth Night is a wonderful examination at the strangeness and vulnerability of people. I am glad we were able to play successfully to that message.

0 Comments

    Author

    Jeff Watkins

    Archives

    July 2018
    February 2017
    November 2015
    October 2015
    October 2014
    August 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    Categories

    All
    2014
    Audition
    Cast
    Cold
    Convention
    Director
    Feature
    Fight
    Flu
    Future
    Good With Words
    Movie
    Promotion
    Shakespeare
    Silent City
    Theatre
    Trailer
    Twelfth Night

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.